Thursday, December 20, 2007

Picture of secret jailing emerging in Pakistan

Nearly 100 freed, told to keep quiet, but stories coming out

Carlotta Gall

The New York Times (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/12/20/MNB6U1083.DTL)

Pakistan's military and intelligence agencies, apparently trying to avoid acknowledging an elaborate secret detention system, have quietly set free nearly 100 men suspected of links to terrorism, few of whom were charged, human rights groups and lawyers say.

Those released, they say, are some of the nearly 500 Pakistanis presumed to have disappeared into the hands of the Pakistani intelligence agencies cooperating with the United States' fight against terrorism since 2001.

No official reason has been given for the releases, but as pressure has mounted to bring the cases into the courts, the government has decided to jettison some suspects and thereby spare itself the embarrassment of having to reveal that people have been held on flimsy evidence in the secret system, its opponents say.

Interviews with lawyers and human rights officials and a review of cases and court records by the New York Times show how scraps of information have accumulated over recent months into a body of evidence of the detention system.

In at least two other instances, detainees were handed over to the United States without any legal extradition proceedings, Pakistani lawyers and human rights groups say. U.S. officials here and in Washington refused to comment on the cases.

"They are releasing them because these cases are being made public," said Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, a lawyer working at the Supreme Court who has taken up many of the cases of the missing. "They want to avoid the publicity."

In addition, human rights groups and lawyers contend, the government has swept up at least 4,000 other Pakistanis, most Baluchi and Sindhi nationalists campaigning for ethnic or regional autonomy who have nothing to do with the U.S. campaign against terrorism.

In total, human rights groups and lawyers describe the disappearances as one of the grimmest aspects of Pervez Musharraf's presidency, and one that shows no sign of slowing.

Under previous governments, "there were one or two cases, but not the systematic disappearances by the intelligence agencies under Musharraf," said Iqbal Haider, secretary-general of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, an independent nonprofit organization.

The Pakistani government denies detaining people illegally and says that many of the missing are actually in regular jails on criminal charges, while other cases have been fabricated.

The issue of the missing became one of the most contentious between Musharraf and the Supreme Court under its former chief justice, Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry.

The releases are particularly galling to lawyers because as one justification for imposing emergency rule on Nov. 3, Musharraf accused the courts of freeing terrorism suspects. That decree was lifted Saturday, but the former chief justice and other judges were dismissed and remain in detention. The Supreme Court hearings on the missing have been halted.

While Musharraf criticized the court as being soft on terrorists, court records show that Chaudhry was less interested in releasing terrorism suspects than in making sure their cases entered the court system.

He said at each hearing that his primary concern was for the families of the missing, who were suffering great anguish not knowing where their loved ones were.

His main aim was to regularize the detention of the missing, not to free them, Siddiqui said. "Not a single person who was convicted was released on the Supreme Court's order," he said.

Detainees have been warned on their release not to speak to anyone about their detention, yet fragments of their experiences have filtered out through relatives and their lawyers. A few even appeared in court and told their stories, and it became increasingly clear that the "disappeared" men had in fact been held in military or intelligence agency cells around the country, often for several years without being charged.

Still, the government denies detaining people illegally or torturing them. Brig. Javed Iqbal Cheema, a spokesman for the Ministry of Interior and leader of the national crisis management cell that deals with terrorism, said many of the men said to be missing had been found in jails or police cells and had been charged with crimes.

Others, he said, may have gone to the hills or Afghanistan to fight and died there. Still others, he suggested, were fabricated. "Let me assure you that there's a lot of politics going on into the missing persons also," he said.

Critics say that abuses continue. The director of the human rights commission, I.A. Rehman, said the government had set up a nearly invisible detention system. "There are safe houses in Islamabad where people are kept," he said, citing accounts from the police and those who have been freed. "Police have admitted this, flats are taken on rent, property is seized, people are tortured there."

In some cases, detainees recounted that they had been interrogated in the presence of English-speaking foreigners, who human rights officials and lawyers suspect are Americans.

A U.S. Embassy spokeswoman said she could not comment on the allegations and referred all questions to Washington. A spokesman for the CIA, Mark Mansfield, declined to comment on Rehman's accusations, or on any specific detainees.

One detainee, a Jordanian named Marwan Ibrahim, who was arrested in a raid in Lahore, where he had been living for 10 years, said he was sent to a detention center in Afghanistan run by Americans, then to Jordan and Israel, and was finally released in Gaza, according to an account Ibrahim gave to Human Rights Watch, another independent group.

Another detainee, Majid Khan, 27, a Pakistani computer engineer who disappeared from Karachi four years ago, surfaced April 15 this year before a military tribunal in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. His American lawyers say he was subjected to torture in CIA detention in a secret location. Mansfield, the CIA spokesman, declined to comment, except to say that the "CIA's terrorist interrogation effort has always been small, carefully run, lawful and highly productive."

"Fewer than 100 hardened terrorists have gone through the program since it began in 2002," he said, "and, of those, less than a third required any enhanced interrogation measures."

As more and more such accounts have come to light, Musharraf has fought vigorously to keep the details of Pakistan's secret detentions hidden.

A week into emergency rule, he passed a decree amending the 1952 Army Act to allow civilians to be tried by military tribunals for general offenses. The tribunals are closed to the public and offer no right of appeal.

The amendment was made retroactive to January 2003. Haider of the human rights commission said the amendment was to cover the illegal detentions by the intelligence agencies. "These agencies have gone berserk, and Musharraf is legitimizing their acts," he said.

Cheema, the Interior Ministry spokesman, acknowledged that prosecutors and investigators had had difficulty pinning crimes on detainees. Hundreds of people in Guantanamo have not been charged either, he pointed out. The Army Act amendment would resolve much of the problem, he said.

"Sometimes it becomes difficult to prove a case, but you have reasons that a person poses a threat to humanity and to society," he said.

The intervention of the Supreme Court under Chaudhry was undoubtedly exposing this system of secret detentions.

He first took up the cases of the missing in 2006, demanding that the government trace the detainees and account for them.

His steady requests for information from senior police, Interior Ministry and military officials in court helped to trace nearly 100 detainees. Most of those were subsequently released without charges.

"This was very embarrassing to the government because the people who were supposed to be found and released, they told all their stories," said Rehman, the director of the human rights commission.

Amina Masood Janjua, who has led a campaign to trace the missing, first learned about news of her husband, who disappeared in July 2005, from a written account by another detainee. Later the detainee, Imran Munir, was produced in court and told her he had been held in the military base at Chaklala, in Rawalpindi, and saw her husband in another cell.

Another detainee, Hafiz Muhammad Tahir, was brought before the court and told the judges he had been ordered by the police to give a false account of his detention and charges against him, Janjua said. In fact he had been held secretly for three years without charge. The chief justice ordered him to be freed, and he was released the same day.

But only four or five detainees ever appeared before the Supreme Court. The majority of the 100 detainees released this year have been freed surreptitiously by the police and intelligence agencies, lawyers and human rights officials said.

"They cannot admit that they had these people because they have no charges against them, no documentation," Janjua said.

Thwarting Justice Khwaja Sharif

Justice Khwaja Muhammad Sharif, Poker, Snow-white’s Whirling Rings of Cigarette Smoke – Going Crazy

Omer. G

Justice Khwaja Sharif of the Lahore High Court, one of those judges who refused to take oath under the PCO, was supposed to give a talk at Aiwan e Adal Lahore, at 10 30am today, Tuesday. Lawyers had planned to take him in the form of a procession from his house in S Block DHA to Aiwan e Adal. Students also had token representation to express solidarity with the judges. At around nine in the morning, a friend who was gracious enough to wake up at this early hour (considering the usual owl-like routine in our university) drove me to the place.

Looking around, we found street after street blockaded. In the vast leafy and quit streets of DHA, polices blockades, manned by policemen in riot gear, presented a very depressing sight. The regime’s PR team is doing a pathetic job. They are not giving us any excuse to believe their claim that the emergency has been lifted. With riot police blockading posh neighborhoods, what kind of a fool will believe that things are back to normal. I asked a senior-sounding police officer standing at one of the barricades about where Justice Sharif’s residence was. He pointed to a street. We went in there and then further until we found another blockade, then another. The policeman was a liar. He had standing right at the opening of Justice Sharif’s street while misguiding me. In any case, I asked the policemen at the other barricade about whether they were there to prevent Justice sahib from coming out. They nodded. At least, they weren’t lying this time. I had a brief chat with them. Then, I walked into another street. I greeted a man just walking past me and asked him how he felt about what was being done to his neighbor Justice Sharif. “It’s wrong, of course.” he said angrily, resuming, “How can there be two views about this?” Then, he went away. After that, I waylaid a middle-aged woman engaged in what appeared to be her daily morning walk, and asked her the same question.

Her expression was part vacant, part melancholic, a queer mixture. She answered, after a pause: “It’s your fault; you the younger generation”. She repeated this again and again. I felt as if wanted to agree with her, adding “You too, ma’am” By this time, I ran into a young reporter from ARY. I said salam and told him that I has was there for the same reason as he was. He told me to go to the Caltex petrol pump nearby, where I would found others of my sort.

We drove out to the Caltex petrol station. There was no one there. I tried calling up some lawyers. One of them told me to call later because his plane was just landing in Lahore or Karachi. The other one told me that it was the Lahore Bar President who would know what was to be done now. Nonetheless, by that time, we could see black coats on the other side of the road. My friend had a class to attend, so he left.

More lawyers gathered until there were around fifty. Then, we walked as a rally, passing through a few streets of Defence Housing Authority, chanting slogans like “yeh general, colonel bay ghayret”, we made our way to the first blockade. The lawyers were quick to push the police and, after some resistance, managed to cross the first barbed wire. That moment, I felt very elated. Just yesterday, at a Students’ rally, the police had been much harder to negotiate with. Today, we had pushed them, at least one bit.

The next blockade, however, was harder. We tried very hard but the police refused to budge. Ultimately all we could make them concede was to allow just a few Lawyer leaders and a few media people to go and present the bouquet that the lawyers had brought for Justice Sharif. All this while, the lawyers kept making a lot of noise, and kept pushing and shoving, but weren’t allowed in. Who says the Judges are free to move?

By that time, despite frantic messaging, only four SAC members were there, while six or seven Jamiat Talaba representatives had also joined in. The Jamiat Talaba members were quite noticeable for their aggressive manner of dealing with the police. Ultimately, however, despite the students’ insistence, no student was allowed to go and meet Justice Sharif.

After a while, Justice Sharif’s son came and addressed the gathering from the other side of the blockade. He conveyed the Honorable judge’s message for the lawyers and civil society at large: Assault against the judiciary will be resisted by the deposed judges, even if it demanded the sacrifice of lives. The judges appreciate the support everyone is showing and they plan to hold fast. Justice Sharif’s son agreed to accompany the lawyers to Aiwan e Adal and speak in lieu of his besieged father.

By that time, I too had to leave for a class. I ran back all the way to LUMS. It took just five minutes or so. Back in LUMS, life was going on just as usual. As I passed a bench, crammed by quite a few guys and girls, dressed up in the latest fashionable western wear brands, I could overhear talk of poker. Poker, I thought, deserved a lot of attention. It’s all about poker, isn’t it.

Near the PDC, basking in the sunlight, a tall, slender, snow-white girl with long flowing ash-brown locks was sitting, smoking a cigarette, holding it between her long, thin, white, soft-looking fingers. She could not have been blowing ring with cigarette smoke, but it looked as though she did. Later, she was rolling something silver between her palms, completely absorbed in her task. For a moment, I thought she was rolling a joint, although at second thoughts, I dismissed the suspicion – you couldn’t do it so publicly. On any ordinary day, she would have looked so irresistibly beautiful. But that moment, smoking in that superbly insular frame of mind, she looked sickly.

I looked at her, and the people back at the bench, and all the merry crowd in between them and I thought about Munshi Prim Chand and his short story about Wajid Ali Shah, the last Nawab of Lucknow. One day, out of nowhere, British soldiers came in, passed by a few absorbed chess players, arrested the Nawab, dragged him through the streets passing by the chess player again, and went away. A lot of things that Muslim India had been proud of, went away with him, never to return. The chess-players, in their insular frame of mind, they did not so much as notice. Is it all about chess? I thought about this and a lot of other things and then my head began swimming – that moment, everything around me looked very sickly.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

A telling account of the Islamabad violence

A detainee in the Islamabad protest speaks
Kamil N.
On midnight of December 15th, President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan officially lifted emergency rule.

Let us forget for now, that the judiciary has been deposed of and that his own puppet judges have now been installed. Let us forget that the constitution of this nation has been treated as if it were a cheap, common whore, to be used and abused at will, changed and altered to justify what Musharraf has done and to grant him more power than ever more. Let us forget that the military, with its new "Army Act" now has the power to court martial civilians in military courts, with no chance of appeals (yes, carried forward from the emergency). Let us forget that, the shedding of his uniform, the lifting of the emergency, all of this is meaningless, since Musharraf had managed to garuntee that he stays in power for at least 5 more years. We were told that Pakistan would "return" to its "road to democracy" after the emergency had been lifted. This is the same "democracy" that Musharraf claims to have been leading us to for the past 8 years.

Allow me now, to show you, my friends, just what "democracy" truly means for Musharraf and for his masters (a.k.a. The United States of America and their lapdogs).

December 17th, 2007 was the day that 280 odd citizens in Islamabad managed to demolish any and all multi-million-dollar worth propaganda that the Pakistani government had been trying to put up regarding how the country would become "peaceful" and "democratic" once the emergency had been lifted. It would have been an ordinary, everyday protest. We marched down the Blue Area road, towards the parliament, accompanied by the police. As we neared the turn to the Geo office, we decided that it was high time to put President Pervez Musharraf's word to the test: Were the deposed judges of Pakistan really "free" to travel around the country as he claimed?

The moment we tried to turn left towards the judges' colony, the police tried to block us. We pushed past them, and that was that: They attacked us.

To call it chaos would be an understatement. They hit us with their laathis (long, stout wooden sticks) and rammed us with their shields. An APC screeched up and down the road, lobbing tear gas shells at us. The air was soon thick with the substance, making us feel as though as our eyes were going to burn out of our sockets and our lungs were about to collapse. We realized that a few of our own had been beaten so brutally that they had succumbed to the tear gas and had simply fainted right there in the middle of the green belt area where we had fled to from the road where the police had chased us off from. It could not have been in a worse location, so some of us ran back, coughing and choking, to lift them up and bring them back.

The police were charging at us from all directions yelling and screaming, attacking anyone they could get their hands on. To make matters worse, some students began pelting the police with stones. However, what the newspapers NEGLECT to mention is that most of us, i.e. the organizers and others students were beside ourselves with rage when this happened. We screamed ourselves hoarse and tried to stop them.

These students were NOT part of the original protest; they seem to have simply "appeared" out of nowhere. Earlier, they were seen harassing some of the journalists covering the protests, fairly odd considering that we wanted this to be fully covered. It is likely that these "students" were not students at all. Their agenda? Thrill seeking? Seems a bit passé, no? At times like this, I wouldn't exclude the idea that they were agents of the government deliberately placed among us to stir up the situation and instigate violence.

The police used this opportunity as an excuse to beat us even more brutally and lob more tear gas. They even threw stones of their own at us, and injured a few of us very badly.

Things came to a head when the SP was hit on the head (no pun intended) with a large rock. The police came charging into the woods like a wave of black, screaming and clashing their batons against the trees. We had no choice but to disperse and only around 20 of us managed to head up north to the judges' colony. When we got there, we found a "welcoming committee" in the form of around 300+ policemen waiting for us. We were surrounded before we knew it. Despite this we refused to wait quietly. We continued with our slogans and one of us stood up and, in front of the entire gathered "crowd" gave a speech decrying what had happened.

Then, before we knew it the anti-terrorist squad (yes ladies and gentlemen, the anti-terrorist squad) had grabbed us from behind and shoved us all into a prison bus that had pulled up silently behind.

Even as we were driven to the thana (holding cell), we refused to keep quiet. We yelled our slogans and decried the police every time we saw them.

At the thana, they eventually separated the men and women. When some women who had escaped the protest earlier came to see if we could be released, they too were arrested. They were not doing ANYTHING but inquiring about our release. The women were eventually taken to another thana in the G-7 sector, for women.

They kept us all locked together in a small holding cell (there were around 30 of us) and took away our mobile phones. By this time our families had heard about what had happened and had gathered outside to try and see if we could be released.

Several hours later, an agreement was reached: The students would be released.
Although we objected to this, saying that we wanted everyone released together, we were encouraged to leave and not be "martyrs".

They kept most of those men, some of them over 50+ overnight. That cell had absolutely no heating and a stone floor with only straw mats to sleep on. In winters, temperatures can reach 0 degrees centigrade in the mornings, which is a cause of great concern for those of us who were released. These were men who had been beaten earlier and some needed medical attention. We were told that they would be released by the morning of the 18th.

But I can't blame these policemen. They were only doing their job. They had been ordered to do what they did, as brutal as it was.

What was done on December 17th was only another example of the sheer desperation of the Pakistani government and the brutality it is willing to use against its own citizens. And all this with the emergency lifted and the constitution restored!

So, where does this leave us? At least now we have no illusions: The upcoming elections WILL be rigged and this "emergency" has not been lifted at all.

The excuse of "terrorists in the North" is another farce that has been used time and time again by the Pakistani army to justify its actions. These same militants were spawned BY the army decades ago, just like the Taliban in Afghanistan were by the United States of America. It's the same case of using ones own monster as an excuse to justify these actions.

Fund for slain Journalist Hayatullah Khan's children

Hayat Ullah Khan was a Pakistani journalist who was the first one to photograph the wreckage of a US missile that killed Pakistani civilians inside Pakistani territory. After reporting on this, he disappeared in December 2005. He was shot dead and his body was found in June 2006 in the North Waziristan region. His wife had protested against his abduction and murder. She also died when a US bomb blew up near her house.


Hayat Ullah Khan was awarded the International Press Freedom Award by the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE). The death of both parents has left behind five children aged 2 to 10. A fund to help the children has been set up by the Canadian Journalists for Free Expression (CJFE). Mohsin Abbas, a friend of Hayat Ullah Khan, makes sure the money from the fund goes to the children. A six-year-old Canadian girl recently donated money to the fund from her own pocket after she heard the story of the slain journalist in school, read more about it below.


To read more about the work of Hayat Ullah Khan visit http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/search/tribal/

Re-inventing Pakistan's Presidency

Dr. Haider Mehdi
(Courtesy The Nation)

“No culture has ever expected its leaders to be saints; in fact, some cultures have prized leadership that is decidedly un-saintly,” wrote an eminent academic, an expert in media and democracy.

Conceptualizations of the political character of leadership have changed since the inception of the idea of democracy which was founded in the ancient Greek “Republic,” when leadership character was defined in Aristotelian terms: “an observable collection of habits, virtues and vices.” In modern times, a significant and fundamental contribution added to Aristotle’s definition was made by Sigmund Freud. Freudian psychology has altered that definition to include “motivation, the subconscious and relationships that help to form all of us as people.” Consequently, political leadership is a sum total of observable personal habits as well as an aggregate of personality traits rooted in an overall development from childhood cognitive factors to career advancement to how a person steers through life – a complex combination of attitudes, motivations, ascribed moral values, self-perception, the perpetual view of others and the nature of interaction with them. Hence, political leadership in the modern sense is a holistic view of a leader’s overall personality development with special emphasis on the notion of what motivates such a person to what he/she does in the realm of political life.

Just like the world at large, the Pakistani masses do not expect their leaders to be saints. However, consciously or unconsciously, whatever the case, the majority of people have come to realize that leaders cannot be taken at face value or for what they say as symbolic rhetoric on a daily basis. The masses are now aware that a political leader’s “motivations” (hidden from visual observations) are the basic ingredient in how they conduct themselves and how they run the business of the state. For example, a self-centered leader bent on prolonging his/her rule or a leader with anti-democratic attitudes is obviously driven by personal motivational forces that do not serve the public’s interests and are consistently opposed and contradictory to the people’s welfare. Therefore, the masses have come to understand and question their present and past leaders’ intentions – they are looking through the prism of leaders’ personal motivational agendas and openly showing contempt and rejection of their politics.

Just like the world at large, the Pakistani masses do not expect their leaders to be saints. However, consciously or unconsciously, whatever the case, the majority of people have come to realize that leaders cannot be taken at face value or for what they say as symbolic rhetoric on a daily basis. The masses are now aware that a political leader’s “motivations” (hidden from visual observations) are the basic ingredient in how they conduct themselves and how they run the business of the state. For example, a self-centered leader bent on prolonging his/her rule or a leader with anti-democratic attitudes is obviously driven by personal motivational forces that do not serve the public’s interests and are consistently opposed and contradictory to the people’s welfare. Therefore, the masses have come to understand and question their present and past leaders’ intentions – they are looking through the prism of leaders’ personal motivational agendas and openly showing contempt and rejection of their politics.

No wonder then that the incumbent ruler of Pakistan, having been in the highest office of the state – the presidency – for eight years, is completely shut out of the public’s hearts and minds. The fact is that no matter what Pervez Musharraf does now or for the rest of his political career, he will never be restored in the public’s eyes. Nor would such a restoration be possible for Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan , or Zia-ul-Haq. The Pakistani presidency is in the ultimate crisis of confidence, distrust and historical evaluation by the public at large. The presidency in Pakistan needs to be re-invented.

The Pakistani masses do not wish the incumbent holder of the presidency or leaders like past military dictators to be in the presidency again (Just like Musharraf, Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan , and Zia-ul-Haq all claimed political and constitutional legitimacy.). People want a Pakistani Nelson Mandela to lead this nation. They want a leader in the presidency that acknowledges the significance of the historical moment in the life of this nation, a commitment to the general public’s welfare and an exceptionally selfless attitude towards public life. They want a president above and beyond personal interests and manipulative politics -- a leader who has an absolute determination for the respect of constitutional democratic norms and fully complies with the principles of ethical political conduct. They want a president who will demonstrate complete understanding and respect for public sentiment and have zero-tolerance of self-propelled ego-centric political behavior. Pakistanis do not wish to be served by a ‘messiah’ in the presidency (that all military dictators have claimed to be), but they expect a leader who will work tirelessly for emancipating the masses (as opposed to women emancipation only) from poverty, illiteracy, lack of health services, polluted cities, unemployment, inequitable social injustice and the restoration of national self-respect, self-reliance and full sovereignty over matters of the nation’s internal and external affairs. The public expects a president to liberate them from the yoke of the American connection and break the traditional colonial pattern of diplomatic relations with the West. The people expect to live in their own country with self-respect and dignity.

The Pakistani masses do not wish the incumbent holder of the presidency or leaders like past military dictators to be in the presidency again (Just like Musharraf, Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan , and Zia-ul-Haq all claimed political and constitutional legitimacy.). People want a Pakistani Nelson Mandela to lead this nation. They want a leader in the presidency that acknowledges the significance of the historical moment in the life of this nation, a commitment to the general public’s welfare and an exceptionally selfless attitude towards public life. They want a president above and beyond personal interests and manipulative politics -- a leader who has an absolute determination for the respect of constitutional democratic norms and fully complies with the principles of ethical political conduct. They want a president who will demonstrate complete understanding and respect for public sentiment and have zero-tolerance of self-propelled ego-centric political behavior. Pakistanis do not wish to be served by a ‘messiah’ in the presidency (that all military dictators have claimed to be), but they expect a leader who will work tirelessly for emancipating the masses (as opposed to women emancipation only) from poverty, illiteracy, lack of health services, polluted cities, unemployment, inequitable social injustice and the restoration of national self-respect, self-reliance and full sovereignty over matters of the nation’s internal and external affairs. The public expects a president to liberate them from the yoke of the American connection and break the traditional colonial pattern of diplomatic relations with the West. The people expect to live in their own country with self-respect and dignity.

The presidency in Pakistan has to be re-invented:

1. From now on, with the new legitimate and constitutionally accepted president to-be, the term of office for the president should remain only 4 years, non-extendable (remember Nelson Mandela, after 27 years of national liberation struggle, chose only a 4 year presidential term). The presidency must be elected by direct public vote.

2. From now on, military generals (serving or retired) shall be constitutionally barred from the office of the presidency.

3. From now on, the development of the presidency’s relationship to power and authority shall be regulated purely by strict legislative measures.

4. From now on, in order to streamline clause (3), the presidency shall have no powers to make appointments of the armed forces chiefs, judges of the apex courts or ambassadors. The presidency shall have only powers to recommend or nominate candidates for such positions. The relevant Parliamentary Committees must approve such recommendations with the presidency having no authority to veto the committee’s non-approval.


5. From now on, the presidency must demonstrate flexibility, adaptability and purposefulness by mature political judgments in all matters of national discourse. The presidency must obtain prior approvals of all of its political initiatives from the parliament.

6. From now on, the presidency shall have no powers to impose martial law, issue ordinances, and dismiss judges of the apex courts or order military operations within Pakistan territory.

7. From now on, the presidency shall have a credible manifesto on establishing direct contact with the masses.

8. From now on, the presidency’s public relationship manifesto must have detailed explanations of how the public’s sense of trust will be maintained in this institution.

9. From now on, the presidency shall have no powers to curb the mass media, regulate freedom of speech and expression or exercise overall control over the broadcasting air-waves. Neither shall the president have a monopolistic presence in the media.

10. From now on, the presidency shall not be the sole spokesperson for national policies, or the making of such policies, both internally and externally. All such powers shall remain vested in the parliament and made operational through the head of the elected government. The presidency shall remain in an advising role.

Demanding sainthood standards of conduct from political leadership is neither desirable nor advisable. But given the history of presidential excesses in Pakistan, this proposal sets the minimum reform expectations for the future democratically-elected presidency of this country.

In re-inventing the presidency, the Pakistani civil society must remain vibrant and engage itself in a deep exploration of the political character of anyone who wishes to occupy the presidency. This will help Pakistanis think deeply about what they, as a political system, mean by and need from leadership.

Indeed, the moment has arrived to change the equations of power in Pakistan from a single entity to the public domain…! Won’t you join in this struggle?

SAC Lahore vigil tomorrow to express solidarity with Islamabad students

The Student Action Committe (Lahore) is holding a candle light vigil starting outside Neher Ghar, 5 zaman park, (close to Aitzez Ihsans house).

This is being held for those in Islamabad who were brutalized, tear gassed, baton charged or arrested on Dec 17th.

Please join us in this act of solidarity and committment that we are all in this together. The agencies, authorities and the regime need to be retold that these voices will be heard, that we will not be silenced, we will not be threatened.

Come light a candle with SAC (Lahore) and other supporters for those in need.

Student Action Committee (Lahore)

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Demo outside Karachi Press Club

Urooj
Around 60 people gathered outside the Karachi Press Club at 03:00 p.m. today to register their protests against the treatment meted out to the Students Action Committee (SAC) rally in Islamabad. The demonstration was jointly organised by the CMKP and the Labour Party of Pakistan (LPP). The call was endorsed by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), International Socialists Pakistan (ISPak), and Peoples Resistance (PR).

Policemen and Rangers personnel had brutally baton-charged and tear-gassed an SAC rally in Islamabad on December 17. Scores were injured, and 40 were arrested. Sixteen of them are yet to be released, and FIRs have been lodged against all of them under Section 144 of the PPC. Tuesday's demonstration in Karachi condemned the State's unprovoked (yes, unprovoked) brutality in Islamabad.

The police mysteriously stayed away from us today, though, even though the demo would count as "agitation." In any case, the best part of the entire demo was that it was a total surkha scene, full of slogans in favour of a Socialist inquilaab! A lot of anti-Musharraf slogans were shouted, including the usual "lathi goli ki sarkar" and "mukk gya tera show Musharraf."

A number of Sindhi naaras also came up. There was one that sounded like: "Musharraf-e-khosa -- Jehova!" (Forgive me for mistakes here please!) We are extremely grateful to everyone who responded to the call at such a short notice, and we apologise for the timings ka confusion. *embarrassed cough*

All in all, it was a VERY successful demonstration. The message that was sent across was clear: We will NOT tolerate the State's bullshit anymore. Wanton brutality is NOT going to stop us. The struggle is going to continue until the judiciary is restored to the pre-November 3 status, and True Democracy is implemented in the country. The State cannot hide behind lies anymore. We know that the lifting of the Martial Law and the upcoming elections are all a farce. We refuse to be fooled anymore. Above all, today's demonstration was another response to The Turd (aka General Musharraf) ka statement about how "agitation would not be tolerated." As always, here's a message to The Turd: "No agitation? UP YOURS, General!!!" :-P The battle has just begun, comrades, and we have to prepare ourselves for a long war. Let's SOCK it to the oppressors!!!

Kiunkey ZINDA hai yeh qaum -- Zinda hai!!! Power to the People!!!

In Complete Solidarity

APDM vows to continue struggle

(Courtesy GEO News)
Chief Muttahida Majlis-e-Ammal, Qazi Hussain Ahmed has said that a country-wide movement has been started for boycotting the upcoming elections.Addressing All Parties Democratic Movement’s first convention here on Tuesday, Qazi said the January 8 polls are a fake and, therefore, urged all the parties to boycott the same. He also appealed to the people not to participate in the elections process.

APDM demands restoration of 1973 Constitution to the position of pre-October 1999.

On the occasion, Chairman Tehreek-i-Insaf, Imran Khan, said Nawaz Sharif, Benazir Bhutto and Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman are engaged in strengthening President Pervez Musharraf and that they have betrayed the nation as well as lawyers and judges.Chief of Pashtunkhwa Mili Awami Party, Mehmood Achakzai, Chief Sindh Taraqi Pasand Party, Dr. Qadir Magsi, Rasool Buksh Paleejo, Hai Baloch, Abid Hussain Munto, Hamid Gul, Hamid Khan, Ghulam Mustafa Khar and other leaders also spoke on the occasion. All of them announced to continue the struggle against dictatorship.

A joint announcement was also issued on the occasion which demanded restoration of 1973 Constitution and judiciary, media’s freedom of expression, supremacy of parliament, halting the continuing military operations in different parts of the country, resolving Balochistan issue through dialogue, granting of autonomy to the provinces and relinquishment of the President’s post by Pervez Musharraf.

The Real Chief Justice condemns police action in Islamabad

Deposed Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry on Monday strongly condemned the brutal torture of Media, Students and Civil Society by the police outside the Judges Enclave. Atharminallah, eminent lawyer an e-mail of the deposed Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who vowed to continue his struggle for the supremacy of law and the Constitution. In the email, the deposed Chief Justice, expressing his solidarity with all the segments of the society, promised, " We will fight till last breath for the supremacy of 'un-tampered' Constitution of 1973 and rule of law". In his message to the Lawyers community, civil society, media and 160 million people in every corner of the country said that these atrocities by police agencies and Govt can never demoralize the judges who refused to take oath under provisional constitutional order on November 3.Terming the Monday's police brutality "Barbaric act" on innocent people outside the Judges Enclave the deposed Chief Justice in his mail said that it was a vicious act committed by the police and other agencies by torturing peaceful demonstrators. "Peaceful protest is right of every citizen of Pakistan as freedom of expression is enshrined under 1973 constitution" the deposed Chief Justice wrote in his mail."Look at the state of condition within a week, blasts in Quetta, Nowshera and Kohat, but the police and agencies are deputed to arrest women, torture students, lawyers and media men protesting for the rule of law," he wrote. Strongly condemning act of torture on civil society, the deposed Chief Justice wrote that the Police and other Agencies are only focussing on arresting Chief Justice of Pakistan, judges and lawyers, where as wanted men can escape from their custody as only two or three policemen are there to guard them."It is highly deplorable and barbaric act of Government, which exposes its weakness and nervousness" he maintained, adding "Is Martial law or so called emergency lifted or it appears mere rhetoric"

Darkness, Light and Eid

Fellows in prison, day and night, and the approach of Eid

Omer. G
My thoughts scatter tonight. As I pen these words, seven days into its cycle, somewhere the moon must be shining, bright and beautiful. Back on earth, the circumstances do not look too heartening. On the wings of the wind, news has reached us that thirty or so of our friends in the great green city of Islamabad linger in the sobering darkness of prison cells. I saw the moon early this evening. It must still be shining. Somehow I cannot find it now when I need it. Is it hiding behind those tall hostel buildings? Maybe, it is being blinded out by the atrocious, unceasing lights that flood our campus all night. This moment, however, all I have before me are a few dim, scattered stars to console an unsettled heart. Noble celestial beings, oldest veterans of the fight against darkness! If you would but peep into the dark cells of my detained fellows, lift their spirits and lighten their woes.

Amidst the darkness, another thought flashes. Why does the Quran repeatedly remind its reader of the recurring cycle of the moon, of days merging seamlessly into nights and nights merging into days. The Quran brings our mind to think about these and, over the centuries, the exegetes responded by penning volumes. Poets probed these phenomena in their own way. Even Kant, the rationalist German philosopher, felt that the starry heavens filled his mind with an ever new and increasing admiration and awe.

To me, tonight the heavens appear unusually dark, in more than one way. Whatever stars there are will be gone by the last hour, which draws nigh. Then, before the end, a new beginning must come. Every night, dawn manages to intervene just in time. I find this a comforting thought. There remains, however, this eternally dreaded possibility: what if the forces of darkness that loom large on this earth can capture these celestial luminaries and permanently blacken them out. That reminds me of Tolkien who, in his fantactic but profound imaginary world, deals beautifully with this thought.

In the bleak and deadening darkness of Mordor, Samwise Gamgee - that simple peasant hobbit, who despite his humble origins emerged as a figure of great moral and spiritual insight – beholds a single shining star. “The beauty of it smote his heart, as he looked up out of the forsaken land, and hope returned to him. For like a shaft, clear and cold, the thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was only a small and passing thing: there was light and high beauty for ever beyond its reach.” I dearly hope that before they vanish, the moon and the stars would provide our incarcerated friends with that same clear and cold assurance - that the Shadow is only a small and passing thing.

For others, the playful little growing moon now heralds the coming to blossom of Eid season. From afar, some of us can already smell the appetizing aroma of festive food and the pleasing fragrances that beautiful humans wear on happy occasions. Beleaguered judges and lawyers still stand defiant against the encroaching oppression of an increasingly authoritarian state; some face the imminent threat of eviction from their homes this Eid; even worse, they face the very real prospect of being forgotten by the nation for which they sacrificed their careers. They and our companions, in the loneliness of their cells, can neither see the moon nor smell the merriment and gaiety of Eid as it approaches.

In the borderless vastness of Arafat, pilgrims will soon gather to importune their Lord, and be remembered of the ultimate reckoning that shall befall all, without exception. Let us bear witness with them, as Prophet Abraham witnessed before us, at great peril to his life that ultimate power belongs to Allah alone, and to no human, no matter how powerful and mighty. Let us join them as we pray for the coming of better days, the return of a spring of justice, human dignity and freedom. Let us pray for strength and courage enough to tear apart the walls of injustice that surround us and our friends in these testing times.

Pictures from the Islamabad Rally
















Monday, December 17, 2007

Eyewitness account of the protest in Islamabad

Tayyab

The numbers have been increasing and today, they were big enough to mount a battle with the police..and invite heavy shelling..the number of students was significant.

it started off in Aabpara, moved to press club in front of holday inn...Imran Khan joined shortly after.. The protesters were escorted by cops all along..the police tried to stop people when they were turning into f-6, right around where the old american express office.. the women charged the police first, followed by students and everyone else..

they pushed the police back, i would say, a good 200 feet... thats when the police started baton charging... students retaliated with their own tiny sticks, and stones...somewhat like the intifada..

police shot tear gas shells...initially one...which actually fell very close to where I was and I got scared, as I was not sure what it was or how it would act.. ;-)

Thats where it got extremely bad...people were spread all over the place..there were around 2/300 police, armed atleast one APC (Armed personnel career) I must say that I was pleasantly surprised to see the emotions of students...and women...old and young...and people... there were tiny kids in the protest...people joined with their families... people were getting injured, and were retreating... many, i saw, were injured, and by this time, the entire ground was full of tear gas smoke...

by this time, people tried to stop students who wouldnt give in.. the people retreated into the parking lot of intercontinental under construction...there were cars there and they thought they would be safe from police throwing shells and stones at the crowd.. went on till dark...and people very very slowly and reluctantly dispersed... no one seemed in a hurry

my impression is that only if we could double the number we had today, (which shouldn't be a big deal), they will have to call in army to control this... the people, especially the youngsters are very angry...that was my impression... also, it was a long walk from Aabpara to Marriott Islamabad...and i met a number of interesting people on the way...

i hope the arrested are freed, and the injured get well soon... i just rambled...and i am sure i was not able to capture the energy of this protest... i salute all pakistanis who joined in today...love you all (message for those who are away) I can understand how you feel being away.. but you are part of this struggle anyways... do you know that all those people who are away, they are contriuting by paying attention... there is something very spiritual about attention...it is a huge contribution, I must say...

we are, as they say, Brethren in the Resistance.

please keep writing, keep pushing..every effort counts..whatever we can..thanks

Questions for Musharraf and Bush

The Washington Post
By John F. Tierney and Aitzaz Ahsan
Monday, December 17, 2007

One of us chairs a House of Representatives subcommittee tasked with oversight of U.S. foreign policy, and one of us languishes under house arrest after transfer from a Pakistani jail for the "heinous" and "seditious" crime of representing, in legal proceedings, the sacked chief justice of Pakistan's Supreme Court.

As members of the political opposition in our respective countries and as lawyers firmly committed to the rule of law, we have a few questions for our heads of state:

How will you address the increasing anti-Americanism in Pakistan in light of the growing, and not unjustified, perception among Pakistan's democratic moderates that the United States is not willing to stand with the people of Pakistan against an increasingly authoritarian and anti-democratic government in Islamabad?

How will you respond to the inevitable international condemnation of a parliamentary "election" in which journalists are muzzled; political parties are prohibited from campaigning; Pakistani military and intelligence services visibly enforce an atmosphere of intimidation; and opposition leaders are exiled, jailed or placed under house arrest?

How do you expect to effectively compete against extremist ideology when U.S. education funding to Pakistan is one-fifteenth its military support and Pakistani funding for public education remains woefully inadequate? Thirteen million children ages 5 to 9 -- out of 27 million total -- are not enrolled in school at all, leaving them exposed to extremist mentors.

How do you expect to combat the Taliban and al-Qaeda cancer spreading from Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas into the Northwest Frontier and Balochistan provinces when the military is busy pointing its guns at judges, lawyers, journalists, political opponents and human rights advocates?

How do you expect to muster the political fortitude and legitimacy to fight extremist Taliban and al-Qaeda forces when you have alienated the center-left and center-right -- the more secular components of Pakistani society?

The people of Pakistan and the people of the United States deserve honest answers to these vexing questions. They are long overdue.

John F. Tierney is a Democratic representative from Massachusetts. Aitzaz Ahsan, an opposition leader in Pakistan's parliament, has represented deposed chief justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry as well as former prime ministers Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto.

Protest outside Karachi Press Club on Tuesday

A joint demonstration has been organised for 03:00 p.m. tomorrow (December 18) outside the Karachi Press Club (KPC), to protest the State's brutalities against the Students Action Committee (SAC) rally in Islamabad today.

While the protest has been called by the CMKP and the Labour Party of Pakistan (LPP), we appeal to Peoples Resistance, lawyers, students, journalists, labour unions -- every citizen -- to please join us there. A strong message has to be sent across to the State tomorrow: these atrocities will NOT stop us!

Friends of the Resistance, today's events in Islamabad proved once and for all that the so-called lifting of the emergency is nothing but a sham. If this was done in Islamabad today, it could be done in Karachi too. Aakhir kabb takk bardaasht karengey yeh tamaasha hum? Please come to the press club tomorrow to express solidarity with the brave souls who stood up to the State's brutalities today.

Countless were injured, and 40 have been arrested (including seven women). We HAVE to show Musharraf and his cronies that this brutality will NOT stop us anymore. Please join us at the press club at 03:00 p.m. tomorrow. Bring yourself, bring friends. Bring banners, flags and placards. Above everything, please try to bring as many people as possible -- there's power in numbers.
Power to the People!!!

In Complete Solidarity

23 lawyers candidates withdraw from the elections

(Courtesy The Post)
TOBA TEK SINGH: Twenty three candidates belong to lawyers' community led by APDM leader Abid Hasan Minto withdrew their nomination papers Saturday on the call of Pakistan Bar Council and APDM leadership to start election boycott campaign. The lawyers went in a procession to the offices of returning officers in district courts complex led by APDM central who withdrew from the district included Labour Party Pakistan central leader and NA-93 and PP-86 candidate Farooq Tariq, district PML-N former secretary Rana Anwar, former DBA president Mian Shahid Iqbal, advocate Safdar Ali Nasir, MMA district secretary Hafiz Abdul Basit, advocate Ch Masaad Ahmad Kahloon, Ch Afzal, Mian Shoaib Muhammad, Khalid Javed, Zahid Sattar, Arshad Javed, Mian Arshad, Ch Ijaz Ahmad, Furqan Habib, Makhdoom Nazar, Sarfraz Khan, Mian Younis, Ziauddin, Irfanul Haq, Munir Ahmad, Mehr Yaseen, Dr Arshad Alam, Attaullah and Mian Shoukat Ali Shoukat.

Update on the students arrested in Islamabad

The seven female protestors arrested have been released without charge. The 35 or so male protestors are still under arrest at the thana on constitutional avenue. According to reports, they are being charged under various offences, including 144 and 7-ATA (Anti-terrorism Act). Some students and lawyers who went to the thana to attempt to procure their release have also been arrested. On what pretext, one cannot say.

it is pertinent to note here that, although the 'emergency' is claimed to have been lifted, its draconian implications are still very much in sway. The brutal response of the police to the student rally is a clear indication of the paucity of basic rights even after the 'restoration' of our battered constitution. Let us not even talk of the continued illegal detention of several judges and senior advocates on no charges whatsoever.

Justice, anyone..?

Message from the Student Action Committee Islamabad

This is to request your urgent help. As you might know, a student protest took place today in Islamabad to protest against emergency and removal of supreme court judges and for the restoration of free media. The protest was attended by about a thousand students and people from all walks of life. In spite of lifting of emergency, however, the police resorted to violent tactics to disperse the protesters, using tear gas and rubber bullets in the process. After a brief episode of violence, most of the protesters dispersed except for few who went on to reach the CJ's house. Here, about 35 students and protesters were arrested and taken to Sectt. police station. Lawyers, students, journalists and other members of the civil society! We request you to please show up at the Sectt. police station to demand the release of these arrested students. This is your chance to stand for freedom and justice.

Police unleashes brutality at student protest in Islamabad

Police teargas, baton-charge, fire (rubber bullets) at and arrest students in Islamabad

The protest at Aabpara Islamabad today (Monday) turned ugly as police baton-charged and tear-gassed the 1000 or so students who had assembled to continue their protest against the continued unlawful acts of the government. The police, in an attempt to stop the march of the students towards the Judicial residences, resorted to repeated baton-charges and tear-gassing, ultimately firing rubber bullets into the crowd, hitting many people, including women.

Ultimately, due to the violent turn of events, a small number of students remained to continue the march towards the judicial residence, where the police surrounded and arrested around 35 people, mostly students, some of them female. At the time of the writing of this report, the detainees were being taken to Adiala Jail. The Student Action Committee Islamabad is meeting to decide the course of action to be taken at this point.

Student Action Committee Lahore continues protest

Press Release:

The Student Action Committee (Lahore) held a protest today against the derisive return to a constitution that was altered to personal specifications by President Retd. General Pervez Musharraf.

The crowd began to gather outside Nasser Bagh at 1 pm. The protest took off around 1 30 pm where the SAC (Lahore) was joined by students, lawyers, activists, academics, civil society members who were all committed to the same cause. Even citizens who were passing by joined in with enthusiasm once they heard what the rally was for.

The students in full flow, with banners reading “Emergency Lifted, Nothing Changed”, “Azaadi” “Restore the Judiciary” chanted slogans with the crowd that was pulsating with an energy that soon spilled out on the roads.

“Tor raha hai Pakistan, aaj keh dor ka Yahya Khan”, “Zinda hai Tulba” , “Pakistan ka bais e tabhai…Pervez Musharraf aur Pervaiz Elahi” could be heard from afar as the crowd proceeded from Nasser Bagh to Anarkali Chowk. Here the protestors stood and chanted some more eliciting encouragement from those passing by in their vehicles.

The police, who had been helpful in maneuvering the protest down the mall, soon realized the impact of the protest and started haranguing the crowd, especially the students, to disperse. They claimed they would press charges against students, if they did not wrap up immediately.

The students and their fellow supporters, charged with energy to be seen and heard, did not crack at such demands and continued to raise slogans at Anarkali Chowk.

The protesters marched back towards Nasser Bagh, where they gathered on top of the roundabout and continued their slogans. After a while, the crowd formed a human chain on the roundabout, demonstrating solidarity with each other as well as the public on common fronts: restoration of the pre Nov. 3rd judiciary, an independent media, and a system where every voice can be heard.

The crowd dispersed after almost 2 hours of high level activities. By the end of the day 150 to 200 people had been noted at the protest.

To be noted: the protest today was held as a reflection of the SAC (Lahore) commitment to work for the said causes regardless of the sham political displays by the regime. The threats by the police were just one reflection of how the state of emergency was lifted but nothing restored, nothing changed.

Girls from Peshawar University stage protest



Peshawar (Dec 17):Female students of Peshawar University staged a protest here to express solidarity with the judiciary and media. Earlier, the administration thwarted plans of holding a peaceful walk on campus by a group of girls numbering one hundred, when its officials along with police armed with AK-47s arrived at the gates of the UOP Girls' Hostel where the walk was expected to begin. The admin locked the hostel gate and nobody was allowed to come out. Later on, few student representatives did manage to step out however they were prevented from taking out a rally. Talking to the media they said the girls from a conservative place like the Frontier were impelled to come out as they considered it as their moral duty. They wanted to protest because of the ongoing situation in the country. According to them, there was growing resentment against dictatorship amongst the students. They expressed concern over the worsening law and order situation in the province and the tribal areas and blamed President Musharraf for throwing the region in a state of turmoil due to, what they termed, his ‘bad policies’. The students said they did not belong to any political party however they supported Imran Khan’s stand of boycotting ‘fraudulent’ elections. They called for restoration of all deposed judges and immediate lifting of curbs on the media. Afterwards, some student representatives displayed their protest placards in front of members of the press and vowed to stage another demonstration next time.It may be recalled, that a students rally was taken out in Peshawar last Thursday also (13 Dec) which was forcibly turned back by armed police and university officials.
(Campus News)

The government response to the student uprisings

Students under the emergency imposed by Musharraf have been harassed for protesting against the ill disguised MARTIAL LAW. Protesting or any right to opinion has been quenched by the government and anyone daring to practice natural freedom has been brutalized by the authorities.

Pre-emptive arrests have become a norm under the new MARTIAL LAW regime in the country as LUMS students and professors were notified of the charges by the government.

The students and professors in question had committed no crime than to practice their legal right to criticize the government. Students have also been warned against protesting on the LUMS campus, which is not on government land. There have been discontent in Government educational institutes as well. And several faculty members of Punjab University were charged with sedition. The reason given for the charges was stirring the masses against the government. Students also have been treated with immense brutality, often subjected to baton charge particularly evident during the recent protest held in Aapara, Islamabad on 4th December, 2007.

Students are also being intimidated not to protest against the government by phone calls. One female student MK talked about her ordeal, “a man called me up and asked if I was the one speaking on the phone, I asked who he was and he threatened me to steer clear otherwise he will have me picked up…he knew where I was and that I had changed the sim on my phone…he also knew there were two more people with me and warned us that shooting us was not beyond him….he threatened to attack me and made clear that he knew of my whereabouts and had all the information on me including my activity on facebook…he said that the emergency had been imposed because of what had happened in Sargodha and such attacks and offered to give me money (or contacts) to stop…he boasted of having plenty to give if only I’ll give into their submission… the place I have been staying at for the few days is constantly being visited by some people claiming to be from the MI/ISI. Last night the people asked the hostel warden to tell me to leave immediately as I would be a threat to the non-political students in the dorm. There has been a green car that has been following my movements. I received another phone call threatening serious consequences again. If the CJ was there today I could go to him for help, in fact he would have taken a suo moto notice once he read the papers but now I don't know who to go for help. There is no justice left in this country.”

Other similar if not more dire threats have been made. Another person SA got similar phone call: death threat, threats of abduction, torture and detention. They said it wasn't hard at all for them to forge a case against him that could destroy his life and cause him to be a shame for his family. KO got threats that his parents will be abducted and his mom raped before his eyes if he does not stop. In addition they said they'll leave a weapon at his place and keep him in jail for 8 year.

The human rights and Pakistanis including the very basic right to freedom of thought and expression have been infringed callously. Some international activists such as Tighe Barry and Medea Benjamin have taken note of the plight of the Pakistanis and have raised their voices with other pro democracy forces in the countries. But to turn the voices of the Pakistanis into a resounding force – in support of democracy the world over – the whole world community in particular human rights organizations to rise up and support the supporters of democracy in Pakistan.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Lifting of Emergency not enough: Human Rights Watch

(Courtesy DAWN)
The US-based Human Rights Watch said Saturday that President Pervez Musharraf's end to the state of emergency in Pakistan would not restore real constitutional rule as it “provides legal cover to laws that muzzle the media and lawyers and gives the army a license to abuse.” Ali Dayan Hasan of HRW said in a statement: “a genuine restoration of Pakistan's constitution would require Musharraf to return to the constitution and judiciary that existed before November 3.” The HRW pointed to a series of decrees issued under emergency rule, including a ban on any later challenges to the legality of the emergency and an amendment to allow the military to try civilians. “The military is Pakistan's principal human rights abuser, yet Musharraf has changed the law so that it can play judge, jury and executioner,” Hasan said. HRW said the United States and Britain should speak up against the president, a key ally in the US-led “war on terror”. “Instead of playing along with Musharraf's power-grab, they should condemn his latest ploy for legitimacy,” the group said.

Rally outside Aitzaz's house

Around 200 people gathered outside Aitzaz Ahsan's house today at around 7 PM in a continuation of the vigils that have been taking place there since the announcement of his withdrawal of his candidature from the elections. Lawyers, students and other concerned citizens shouted slogans calling for his release and other illegally detained heroes, like Ali Ahmed Kurd, Tariq Mahmood and Muneer A Malik, as well as the reinstatement of the judiciary. As their numbers swelled, the protestors marched in the form of a rally towards the main road next to Zaman Park, where they formed a human chain on the sidewalk, while contiuing the charged sloganeering. At the time this report was being penned down, the protest was still underway.

Student Action Committee Lahore issues call for the 17th

Emergency lifted: nothing restored


We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

Even after the emergency has been lifted, the country is still under the stranglehold of the regime. The Student Action Committee (Lahore) will continue to fight for our country’s rights.

Without an independent and free minded judiciary, we the people will never have protection.

Without an unshackled media, we the people will never have a voice.




Join the Student Action Committee (Lahore) and other civil society groups in pushing through the barriers to freedom.

Come join us in a peaceful protest at Nasir Bagh on the 17th of December 2007 at 1 pm.

A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. - Edward Abbey





Student Action Committee (Lahore)
Disclaimer: We are not affiliated with any political party, rather we represent the collective conscience of the students of Pakistan. Joins Us: saclhr@hcs.harvard.edu

Declaration by Pakistan's former Ambassadors

We, as former ambassadors of Pakistan, deplore the imposition of the state of emergency and suspension of the Constitution by General (R) Pervez Musharraf. As the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared on 3 November, 2007, these steps, which amount to the imposition of martial law, are unconstitutional and illegal. Besides undermining the rule of law and delivering a severe blow to the independence of judiciary, they have dangerously destabilised the country. They also have incurred international opprobrium and badly tarnished Pakistan's image. We, therefore, demand:

. Immediate restoration of the Constitution and the judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts as constituted before the declaration of emergency on 3 November 2007.

. Formation of neutral caretaker Cabinets at the Federal and Provincial levels and reconstitution of the Election Commission to ensure the holding of free, fair and transparent elections to the National and Provincial Assemblies.

· Immediate release of all persons imprisoned or detained under the emergency, including judges, lawyers, journalists, students and others.

· Full restoration of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the lifting of all restrictions imposed on the media.

· Strict adherence by the armed forces to their oath and constitutional role, in accordance with the directives given by the Quaid-e-Azam.

· Strict application of the principle of accountability of holders of public office.

We call upon the parties and the candidates participating in the elections to make a solemn commitment to treat the reinstatement of the judges of the superior judiciary as the top priority issue after the elections. The nation also expects that political parties and members of future national and provincial legislatures would adhere to recognized democratic norms in their future conduct and pay serious attention to the overcoming of the daunting challenges facing the nation. We express our deep appreciation to the judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts who refused to take oath under the PCO, the lawyers for leading the movement for the restoration of the rule of law, the journalists for resisting the regime's efforts to gag the media and the human rights activists, students and other members of civil society for lending their full support to the democratic movement. We express our solidarity with the nation in its demand for the full restoration of democratic and constitutional rule in the country.

1. Mr. Riaz Piracha, former Foreign Secretary
2. Dr. Humayun Khan, former Foreign Secretary
3. Tanvir A. Khan, former Foreign Secretary
4. Shamshad Ahmad, former Foreign Secretary
5. Riaz H. Khokhar, former Foreign Secretary
6. Dr. S M Koreshi
7. Gul Haneef
8. Amin Jan Naim
9. Touqir Hussain
10. Karamatullah Khan Ghori
11. Amir Usman
12. Javid Hussain
13. S. Azmat Hassan
14. Naeem U. Hassan
15. Shafqat Ali Shaikh
16. Karam Elahi
17. Afzal Akbar Khan
18. Mazhar Qayyum
19. Asif Ezdi
20. S. Iftikhar Murshed
21. Iqbal A. Khan
22. Shirin Safdar
23. B.A. Malik Islamabad,

13 December 2007

Pictures from Student Rally in Peshawar





What if we lose?

- Haray bhee to bazi maat nahin!
Omer.G
I have a feeling that fellow students, lawyers, and many other citizens want to pose us a tough question. Something – perhaps love for us or fear of breaking our hearts, hope for the movement or despair of ever convincing us to quit it – keeps them from saying it loud. The question is: What if we lose?

We hope that this wouldn’t happen. Somehow the powers-that-be will quiver before the moral force of our argument and if they don’t, whatever political government that emerges out of the elections will. Nonetheless, let us suppose what the cynics have always believed. Suppose that no one listens to us and, as Kamila Hyat put it, ‘in our lonely walk’, we end up no where? What if our movement fails to bring the legitimate judges back? What if one by one, those trampled flowers wither and vanish and freedom’s tender wings remain forever clipped in this country? What good is all the hue and cry we raised and still raise, and all the effort that it takes, if the movement’s objects are never achieved?

If that happens - it being the worse that could possibly happen - I believe our efforts would still not have been in vain. The great thing about a social movement is that it is never lost. We are lucky to be engaged in a principled moral endeavor, in love’s lonely labor, which even defeat cannot render futile. As Faiz put it:

Yeh baazi ishq ki baazi hae, jo chaho lara do dar kaisa?
Gar jeet gaey to kia kehnay, haray bhee toe baazi maat nahin. - Faiz

There are gains produced by this movement that even defeat cannot wipe off. For one, the movement has left countless individuals who participated in it, particularly students and young lawyers, fundamentally changed. The legal profession in Pakistan has not been known for a display of integrity or honesty. When these young protesting lawyers go back to their trade, they will hopefully take home with them some of this principled behavior.

Students of elite institutions like LUMS and FAST have also long been known for a lack of social and political sensitivity. If you were ask them about the state of affairs in this country the standard response would be either of the two: “There’s nothing you can do about it”, or “I plan to settle abroad”. Today, the same youth is preparing to inherit this country with all its struggles and all its bounties. Even if they withdraw now from the arena of practical politics, they will take back with them a deeper concern for and engagement with the problems that common people in this country face. I know many students who seemed destined to become ruthlessly effective tools in the machinery of global economic imperialism – this brief brush with activism has left them thinking. Some, if not all of them, have resolved to utilize their undisputed talents in fighting the people’s war in whichever field of life they end up in.

Many eyes, formerly blind, have come to see the gravity of the situation around them. Inwards, those very eyes shall soon turn. Perhaps, they will uncover some remedy to that impoverishment which globally afflicts the human soul in this age of materialism, objectification and commodification. As resistance to the evil outside blossoms, let each and every one of us reflect also upon the very meaning and purpose of human existence, social life, our daily live, education and all other endeavors. In many minds, that introspection has already begun, sharp tongues are wagging and desiccated pens like mine are pouring floods – how can the effort then be considered futile.

Beyond the contribution it has made to the individuals involved in it, the current civil society movement has already bequeathed a legacy to the nation at large. It has given the country an inspiring glimpse of what politics can be, if it is done honestly and in a principled manner. Also, it has dispelled a notion that the 90’s experience popularized; the notion that, in this country, elected government and corruption can never be separated. By infusing into popular discourse the ideas of rule of law and strict constitutionalism, this movement has revived the hope for bringing in rule-bound elected governments, which are effectively restrained from corruption and authoritarianism by judicial independence and the vigilance of media and civil society.

We are a nation that has lost its heroes, not to gradual erosion by history but to swift corrosion worked by mysterious forces. Political leaders either lost or sold their credibility ages ago. War-heroes slip out of our fingers once we begin to contemplate the possibility that maybe we really didn’t win all those wars and they were sparked by the ambition and adventurism of certain power-hungry individuals. Even sportsmen have become quite disappointing. Recently, forces bigger than our miserable bully-of-a-state have stolen the integrity of the nuclear scientist, denying our last civilian hero.

Today, however, a whole new crop of national heroes has sprung up – lawyers, judges, activists, not one but dozens. As I pen these words, from within the sobering darkness of their prison cells and sub-jails, the likes of Justice Iftikhar Chaudhary and Advocate Muneer A. Malik are defining the true meaning of integrity. In their own neighborhoods, people are finding heroes like Justice Siddiqi of Lahore, in whose defense they can willingly sacrifice their liberties, and others in turn are willing to risk their own liberties and comforts so as to secure their release.

Finally, this episode has shown the world a picture of Pakistan that it had never seen before – a picture so inspiring that some Americans lawyers have actually decided to copy us. In this age of cultural imperialism and the exercise of hegemonic soft power, this is no less than a miracle. It is the one of those miracles that only true love for a cause can bring about – love which is incomplete without a passionate hope of success, but remains as valuable a sentiment, even when it stays forever unrequited.

Account of Saturday Rally in Karachi

pix up at http://www.teeth.com.pk/blog/
- Well done, all those who worked so hard on getting together a show
of strength in Karachi. It went smoothly & peacefully. The only
downside was that the hired pickup with speakers leading it often went
too fast (maybe pushed by the police who wanted the rally to end
quickly) and that the event coincided with the Irtiqa seminar on the
judiciary held at the Press Club (because of the rally date change),
presided over by Minhaj Barna (who launched his book of poetry right
before the Live with Talat event).

Protesters started to assemble at Regal Chowk at around 4:00 pm.
Within minutes the crowd swelled up to a few hundred under the
watchful eyes of a dozen or so policemen. Participants shouted slogans
against Musharraf and the Emergency and called for the restoration of
the judiciary and media freedom. One constable watching the spectacle
of diverse flags (including several Pakistan flags) and placards
amidst the din of traffic and full-throated slogans told a journalist,
"In our hearts we say the same thing as you. But what we are on duty
and we can't join you."

The diversity of the participants cut across the divisions of right-
and left-wing politics, ethnicity, class, education and gender. People
from various walks of life present ranged from lawyers, doctors,
engineers, journalists, writers, to labourers, students, and
housewives, as well as the families of the victims of enforced
disappearances in Balochistan, brought to the rally by Baloch Students
Organization (BSO) Azad and their dynamic chaddar-clad central
executive committee member, Karima Baloch.

Several political parties participated, including Pakistan
Tehreek-e-Insaf, Awami Tehreek, PML-N (Shazia Faizi), National
Worker's Party (Yusuf Mastikhan and Usman Baloch), Labour Party of
Pakistan (LPP, Nasir Mansoor), International Socialists, Communist
Mazdoor Kissan Party(CMKP), Pukhtoonkhawa Milli Awami Party (PMAP),
Jamat-e-Islami, and Shabab-e-Milli. Other groups included Islamic
Lawyer Forum, Railway Workers Federation, the Human Rights Commission
of Pakistan (HRCP), Aurat Foundation, Women's Action Forum (WAF),
Democratic Labour Action Committee, and the PC Workers Union.

Police officers initially refused to allow the rally participants to
make their way in a procession through the crowded Saddar area to the
Karachi Press Club barely a kilometer down the road, but had obviously
been briefed not to use force. After some negotiations, they allowed
the rally to proceed.

An interesting mix of slogans was heard as leftist and right-wing
parties marched sided by side, ranging from "Asia Surkh Hai!" (Asia is
Red) to religious-oriented slogans. Participants held up placards
featuring images of Che Guevara, the 'non-PCO judges', and the
'disappeared'. "This is the essence of democracy," remarked a
participant.

Akbar Shah, an elderly tourist guide in a shabby shalwar kurta and
tennis shoes standing on the sidewalk raised his hands in appreciation
as the rally turned towards the Press Club and talked aloud to
himself, "Go Musharraf go, so nice, good slogans."

Enthused by the crowd, he accompanied them to the Press Club where
leaders from various parties addressed the gathering from the back of
a hired pick-up vehicle. They condemned the illegitimate usurpation of
power by Musharraf and urged for the restoration of Judiciary which
can be the corner stone for the return of democracy in Pakistan.

Friday, December 14, 2007

SAC Islamabad issues call for the 17th

SAC I7 th December Protest
Student Action Committee
Rawalpindi/Islamabad

Will the general taking off his uniform benefit the people of Pakistan?

After the lifting of the emergency will our rights be guaranteed?

Can there be free and fair elections in the absence of the real judiciary?

Our protest continues:

 For the restoration of the Chief Justice and his fellow judges

 For the lifting of all curbs on the media

 For the withdrawal of the army from the politics once and for all

 For the restoration of student unions

 For an end to the class system of education

JOIN US:
Monday, 17th December 2007
3pm, Aab Para Chowk, Islamabad

If not us, then who?

If not now, then when?

(The SAC Lahore will respond to the call of their brethren in Islamabad by staging a protest on the same day. The time and venue for the Lahore protest will be decided today.)

Discussion with reknowned economist Kaiser Bengali

(We encourage you to RSVP so we can make adequate seating arrangements! details below)
What will be discussed:
Has there been significant economic development during the Musharraf Regime ?

How much of it is a myth and how much of it is true economic development?

What does the much hyped growth rate mean for us Pakistanis?

Is the economic growth sustainable ?

Date: Sunday, 16th December, 2007 Time: 4:00- 7:00 PM

Venue: Shirkatgah Offfice , Meeting Room ( 1st Floor) , 2 Bath Island Road, Parin Lodge, Bath Island, Karachi.

We encourage you to RSVP so we can make adequate seating arrangements ! For more information feel free to call us at 0334-3028811 or email to moneeza.ahmed@gmail.com

Guilty as Charged

By Farhat Haq: Dawn, December 14, 2007

UNTIL Nov 3, when President Musharraf declared a state of emergency in Pakistan, I was living the life of an academic in the safety and comfort of a small Midwestern college town in the US where my biggest worry was that my sixteen-year-old son now had a driver’s licence. The declaration of emergency pulled me into the peculiar emotional state inhabited by those of us who experience the turmoil of their native lands while living in the safety and comfort of their adopted homelands.I watched on the television screen as Pakistani protesters were beaten by plain-clothed security personnel and hauled away to prison. It made me want to join the street demonstrations. Instead I tried to go about my daily routine, almost bursting into tears once as the checkout person at the grocery store asked innocently, “How’s everything?”

Then the emergency came to find me. “They have issued an FIR [first information report] for you along with three other faculty and two students,” a Pakistani colleague from a university in Lahore, where I sometimes teach, informed me. To my colleague the fact that I was accused of disturbing the peace by “chalking on the wall … writing inappropriate things about the government” when I was not even in the country was just one more indication of the Kafkaesque world Pakistan has entered since the declaration of the state of emergency.

The government is supposedly fighting Islamic radicals and bringing on what is alleged to be the ‘third stage’ of democracy. Oddly enough, it seeks to accomplish these goals by suspending the Constitution, shutting off the independent media, manipulating the January election, packing the courts with compliant judges willing to take an oath of office under whatever President Musharraf says is the law and, finally, imprisoning secular and progressive figures who dare to voice truly democratic aspirations for their country. Add to this last strategy the issuing of arrest warrants for troublesome scholars (including yours truly) who are not even residing in Pakistan.

Of course I am very proud of this FIR. It makes me feel as if I am actually doing something. But my husband is not amused. He has experienced imprisonment and interrogation at the hands of Pakistani police, during another dark time in Pakistani history, when another general hung the first popularly elected prime minister and arrested student leaders in order to keep ‘peace’ in the streets. “You do not know what kind of trouble they can make for you when you go back to Pakistan,” he told me as I cheerfully showed him the email. “This is not a laughing matter.”

Growing up in Pakistan, I knew FIRs were nothing but trouble. My extended small-town and rural Punjabi family mostly kept on the right side of the law, but there was a maternal uncle of mine, a rabble-rouser who had eloped with another man’s wife, who was familiar with FIRs, thanas (jails) and police. Such involvement was no picnic. Nor was the process particularly fair.Successfully lodging an FIR against one’s adversary was a sure sign of one’s connections and ability to humiliate the enemy. With FIRs in hand the police could raid your house and arrest all the males. If they really wanted to humiliate the family, they would haul the female members to the thana too.

For a middle-class Pakistani, no encounter with the law could possibly be very good. For working-class and poor Pakistanis, encounters with the law are likely to be ruinous. One does not turn to law to get justice; the powerful use the law to keep others under their control. Equality under the law, a rudimentary principle of modern citizenship, remains elusive for Pakistanis. FIRs, along with other legal instruments — the detritus of British colonial rule — has continued to subjugate the Pakistani public.

A few months before the current state of emergency was declared came a glimmer of hope. For the first time in Pakistan’s history, the judges of the Supreme Court resisted arbitrary rule and asserted supremacy of the law. Sitting here in the US and looking at the unfolding political drama in Pakistan, I saw the first act as being ho-hum. A chief justice was told that he should resign or he would be charged with misusing his office and thus dismissed anyway. There were rumours of sweetening the deal further by promising sweet real-estate deals and cash.

The chief justice refused and insisted on facing the charges against him. The accused chief justice became a lightning rod for a movement for an independent judiciary. The chief justice got reinstated. The ordinary people rejoiced and looked to the Supreme Court to get justice. People started urging the courts to take suo motu action on all kinds of grievances: traffic jams, graft and corruption, kidnapping, disappearances, unfair selection for the national cricket team. Could it possibly be that, for ordinary people, the law would no longer be their enemy; that they could finally look to the legal system to get justice?

Unfortunately, this first act concluded with the imposition of the current ‘emergency’. We are now in the middle of the second act. How it will turn out, nobody really knows. But I am part of it. A warrant has been issued for my arrest, despite the fact that I am thousands of miles away from the trouble. I accept this warrant proudly. In a way, it is no mistake. If it is criminal for a daughter of Pakistan to long for freedom and justice, then I plead guilty.

The writer teaches political science at Monmouth College in Illinois, US.

Teleconference with Bar Association of San Francisco

Last night (6 pm to 7:40 pm, Pacific Standard Time), the Bar Association of San Francisco (BASF) hosted a teleconferece with lawyers in Pakistan to discuss the suspension of Pakistan's Constitution and the arrest of Supreme Court and High Court Judges, lawyers and activists. The event was recorded so that you can listen, first-hand, to the reports from lawyers who were arrested. There is link to the audio recording below that you can click on to listen to the teleconference.

For lawyers, and those who believe that democracy is based on an independent judiciary that enforces the rule of law, it will be shocking to hear about Supreme Court and High court judges still under house arrest. This is a teleconference well worth your time to listen to.

On November 3, 2007, the Constitution of Pakistan was unilaterally suspended by the President, General Musharaff. By evening the majority of the Supreme Court Judges and other Judges were under house arrest. All Pakistani and international news channels were forced off the air. In order to curb criticism of the suspension of the Constitution, the government cracked down hardest on the lawyers. More than 5,700 lawyers, judges, activists and journals were imprisoned for voicing their opposition and demonstrating peaceably.

The real reason for suspending the Constitution and purging the judiciary was that Pakistani law did not allow General Musharaff to continue in power. His election for another five-year term was under challenge in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court was expected to announce its ruling on November 8, but Musharaff's actions effectively dismantled the judiciary.
On December 12, 2007, The Bar Association of San Francisco held a teleconference with prominent Pakistani Lawyers, all of whom were previously arrested and incarcerated without bail. They are:

a. Zahid F. Ebrahim, Supreme Court of Pakistan Advocate, Partner of Ebrahim Hosain
b. Khwaja Ahmed Hosain, Barrister at Law, Partner of Ebrahim Hosain
c. Salahuddin Ahmed, Barrister at Law, Partner of Malik, Chaudhry, Ahmed and Siddiqi

The teleconference was moderated by Nanci Clarence, of Clarence & Dyer LLP and 2007 BASF President, Naomi Rustomjee, of Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLP, and Kurshid Khoja, of Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP. The Pakistani Lawyers commented not only on the situation in Pakistan, but also on the implications for the safety and security of the United States.

To listen to the teleconference, click on the link below.
https://cc.readytalk.com/play?id=go985m4q

Note: Recording playback requires Flash. If you do not have Flash installed, you will be prompted to install it before playback begins.

For additional instructions on playback, click here:
https://www.callinfo.com/help/ArchivePlaybackInfo.html

Note: This live recording was made by:
David Bennett Major, Lindsey & Africa
Managing Director
500 Washington Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

Massive rally in support of Aitzaz

As you know, Aitzaz Ahsan has withdrawn from the election. In the process, he has restored hope in all of us and proven himself to be a leader in the truest sense.

AITZAZ'S ATTORNEYS ARE WITHDRAWING HIS PAPERS ON HIS BEHALF ON SATURDAY, December 15, at 11 am at AIWAN-E-ADAL, backed up by a MASSIVE show of support from the legal community and civil society.

It is up to all of us now _ Students, Doctors, Professionals - ALL of civil society - to join the movement and rally for the sake of our principles. COME, BRING YOUR FRIENDS, TELL THEM TO BRING THEIR FRIENDS. The venue again is Aiwan-e-Adal (adjacent to Town Hall), Lower Mall at 11 am on Saturday.

In Unity there is Strength.

In Strength, Victory.

In Complete Unity

Details of IRI Poll - Musharraf's popularity at rock-bottom

Recently Musharraf challenged the media to ask the real people of Pakistan and asserted that he is popular in Pakistan.

The following video shows more: http://www.yousufnazar.com/?p=293

The complete results of an IRI poll are available onlineat the following link: http://www.iri.org/mena/pakistan/pdfs/2007-12-12-pakistan-poll.pdf

Here is a summary:

* Most respondents (52%) belonged to middle class and earn between Rs.3,000 to Rs.10,000 per month.

* 76% oppose crackdown on lawyers & TV stations, and house arrest of Supreme Court judges

* 70% oppose state of emergency & ban on political rallies

* 66% feel emergency was imposed to save Musharraf's neck, instead of fighting terrorism

KEY ISSUES

* 68% people worry about inflation & unemployment

* 68% feel Musharraf govt's performance has been poor

* 72% oppose Musharraf's re-election as President

POPULARITY OF CANDIDATES

* Overall, Benazir is most popular (31% support),followed by Nawaz Sharif (26% support).

* Benazir is widely popular in SINDH & BALUCHISTAN.

* Nawaz Sharif is leading popularity ratings in PUNJAB

* Nawaz Sharif also leads popularity ratings in NWFP, followed by Imran Khan.

Zafar Ali Shah also opts out of election

(Courtesy The Daily Times)
Senior PML-N leader Zafar Ali Shah on Thursday announced to boycott the January 8 polls to protest the judges’ deposition.

Talking to Daily Times, Shah said that he was a lawyer and chose not to contest elections under current circumstances when the constitution was suspended and the judges were detained.

“I can’t disassociate myself from the lawyers’ struggle for restoration of judiciary,” he said.

PPP leader and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) president Aitzaz Ahsan had also pulled himself out of the election race in protest against the November 3 extra constitutional steps by the president. He has been under house arrest in Lahore.

Shah said that he had filed nomination papers for NA-49 of Islamabad and NA-55 and NA-56 of Rawalpindi but would withdraw the same from all three constituencies in a day or two.When asked about the PML-N’s decision to contest elections, he said that he had violated no party policy and was left with no choice but to follow the legal fraternity’s decision of election boycott as a lawyer. He said he would fear expulsion from his party for the decision. “PML-N chief Nawaz Sharif has been demanding restoration of pre-Nov 3 judiciary. Therefore, I see no reason that my party would expel me,” he said.